Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.02 seconds)Ram Sarup vs State Of Haryana And Ors. on 28 August, 1978
We think that
such adjustment is not feasible for practical reasons. We
have extended equitable considerations to such selected
candidates who have worked in the post for a long period,
but the contesting respondents do not come in that class.
The effect of our conclusion is that appointments made long
back pursuant to a selection need not be disturbed. Such a
view can be derived from several decisions of this Court
including the decisions in Ram Sarup vs. State of Haryana &
Ors., 1979 (1) SCC 168; District Collector & Chairman,
Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society,
Vizianagaram & Anr. vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, 1990 (3)
SCC 655; and H.C.Puttaswamy & Ors. vs. The Honble Chief
Justice of Karnataka High Court, Bangalore & Ors., 1991
Supp. (2) SCC 421. Therefore, we must let the matters lie
where they are.
District Collector And Chairman ... vs M. Tripura Sundari Devi on 20 April, 1990
We think that
such adjustment is not feasible for practical reasons. We
have extended equitable considerations to such selected
candidates who have worked in the post for a long period,
but the contesting respondents do not come in that class.
The effect of our conclusion is that appointments made long
back pursuant to a selection need not be disturbed. Such a
view can be derived from several decisions of this Court
including the decisions in Ram Sarup vs. State of Haryana &
Ors., 1979 (1) SCC 168; District Collector & Chairman,
Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society,
Vizianagaram & Anr. vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, 1990 (3)
SCC 655; and H.C.Puttaswamy & Ors. vs. The Honble Chief
Justice of Karnataka High Court, Bangalore & Ors., 1991
Supp. (2) SCC 421. Therefore, we must let the matters lie
where they are.
1