Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.26 seconds)Section 28 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 2 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bank Of Baroda & Ors vs Ganpat Singh Deora on 18 December, 2008
The Court, thus,
found that the judgment of the High Court in Dharam Pal Singh was
contrary to the decision in Bank of Baroda case and set aside the
same. In Bank of Baroda, this Court has held that unless 15 years
service is rendered by an employee, he will not be eligible for
pensionary benefits. To quote the relevant discussion on this aspect,
we reproduce the following passage therefrom:
Dharam Pal Singh vs Punjab National Bank And Ors. on 25 January, 2008
9. This position could not be disputed by learned counsel for the
respondent. A perusal of the judgment of this Court in Dharam Pal
Singh (supra) (CA 2132/2011) would demonstrate that the issue
involved in the case had already been determined by this Court in Bank
of Baroda & Ors. vs. Ganpat Singh Deora (2009) 3 SCC 217 where the
identically worded Regulations were considered.