Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 55 (0.42 seconds)
Sangeeta Bhadauria vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 November, 2021 cites

Smt. Sangeeta Bhadoriya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 April, 2018

5. It has been rightly submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that ordinarily power under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash an FIR because that amounts to interfering with the statutory power of the police to investigate a cognizable offence in accordance with the provisions of CrPC. As per law settled by a catena of judgments, if the allegations made in the FIR prima facie HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR M.Cr.C. No. 44175/2021 ( Sangeeta Bhadoriya Vs The State of MP. & another ) (3) disclose a cognizable offence, interference with the investigation is not proper and it can be done only in the rarest of rare cases where the court is satisfied that the prosecution is malicious and vexatious.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990

12. The counsel appearing for the appellant also drew our attention to the same decision which is relied upon in the impugned judgment by the High Court i.e. State of HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT GWALIOR M.Cr.C. No. 44175/2021 ( Sangeeta Bhadoriya Vs The State of MP. & another ) (10) Haryana v. Bhajan Lal. In the said decision, this Court held that it may not be possible to lay down any specific guidelines or watertight compartment as to when the power under Section 482 CrPC could be or is to be exercised. This Court, however, gave an exhaustive list of various kinds of cases wherein such power could be exercised. In para 103 of the said judgment, this Court, however, hastened to add that as a note of caution it must be stated that the power of quashing a criminal proceeding should be exercised very sparingly and with circumspection and that too in the rarest of rare cases for the Court would not be justified in embarking upon an inquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the first information report or in the complaint and that the extraordinary or the inherent powers do not confer an arbitrary jurisdiction on the Court to act according to its whim or caprice.
Supreme Court of India Cites 44 - Cited by 19733 - S R Pandian - Full Document

Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia & Anr. Etc vs Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre & Ors. ... on 9 February, 1988

Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre also does not help the respondents. In that case the allegations constituted civil wrong as the trustees created tenancy of trust property to favour the third party. A private complaint was laid for the offence under Section 467 read with Section 34 and Section 120-B IPC which the High Court refused to quash under Section
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 1281 - M Rangnath - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next