cites: 193363592

Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993

However, two conflicting views are expressed by the Supreme Court in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad & Ors. v. B. Karunakar & Ors (referred supra) and followed in later judgment of the Apex Court in Haryana Financial Corporation v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (referred supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 64 - Cited by 2043 - Full Document

Union Of India And Ors vs Mohd. Ramzan Khan on 20 November, 1990

In Haryana Financial Corporation v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja13, the Division Bench of the Apex Court considered the consequences of non-supply of inquiry report and after considering various judgments from different countries with regard to conduct of enquiry and failure to furnish copy of the report, the Supreme Court after taking into consideration the judgments in Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan (referred supra) and three Judge Bench decision of the Apex Court in Kailash Chander Asthana v. State of U.P14, held that non-supply of the report would not `ipso facto' vitiate the order of punishment, in the absence of prejudice 11 (2014) 7 SCC 340 12 (2005) 2 SCC 237 13 (2008) 9 SCC 31 14 (1988) 3 SCC 600 MSM,J WP_16709_2020 10 to the delinquent.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 668 - R B Misra - Full Document

Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 0 - Cited by 122106

R.P. Bhatt vs Union Of India And Ors on 14 December, 1986

In Ram Chander v. Union of India & ors3 where the decision in R.P. Bhatt v. Union of India (supra) was followed, and the Court held that, copy of the inquiry report shall be furnished to the delinquent employee in terms of Section 27(2) and in the event of failure, it would vitiate the entire proceedings.

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 131 - A P Sen - Full Document

N.T.C. (Wbab And O) Ltd. And Anr. vs Anjan K. Saha on 24 August, 2004

In any event, in view of the subsequent judgments of the Supreme Court in S.K. Singh v. Central Bank of India9, Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. v. S. Balakrishnan10, NTC (WBAB & O) Ltd. v. Anjan.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 24 - D M Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Ahmed Mohiuddin vs State Bank Of Hyderabad And Ors. on 2 May, 2003

K. Saha (referred supra), which require an employee to show that prejudice was caused to him on account of non-supply of the enquiry report before the punishment imposed calls for interference, in Sri Ahmed Mohiddin v. The State Bank of Hyderabad (referred supra) is no longer good law.

Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 17 - Cited by 2 - G Raghuram - Full Document

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs S. Balakrishnan on 21 February, 2001

In Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. v. S. Balakrishnan (referred supra) and Divisional Manager, Plantation Division v. Munnu Barrick and others12, the Apex Court held that non- supply of enquiry report could not have vitiated the proceedings and it does not cause any prejudice.

Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 42 - B N Agrawal - Full Document

Haryana Financial Corporation & Anr vs Kailash Chandra Ahuja on 8 July, 2008

However, two conflicting views are expressed by the Supreme Court in Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad & Ors. v. B. Karunakar & Ors (referred supra) and followed in later judgment of the Apex Court in Haryana Financial Corporation v. Kailash Chandra Ahuja (referred supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 227 - C K Thakker - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Pandey vs Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment ... on 2 May, 2008

But, in Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P Limited (referred supra), there is a slight difference in the law. However, the view expressed in all the judgments is one and the same.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

St. Stephen'S College vs University Of Delhi on 6 December, 1991

In St. Stephen's College v. University of Delhi23 the Apex Court held as follows:

Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 272 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]