Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (1.93 seconds)
Maruti Balu Pawagi vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 March, 2017 cites

State Of M.P vs Narmada Bachao Andolan & Anr on 29 September, 2011

The petitioners were uprooted from their environs and relocated at Shedgewadi, without any measures of rehabilitation worth the name being provided for them. In particular, the lands allotted to the petitioners remain barren for want of water supply and irrigation facility. The State Authorities have breached their own policies of rehabilitation first and development later. The State Authorities have acted in breach of the law declared by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in cases of N.D. Jayal (supra) and Narmada Bachao Andolan (supra) that rehabilitation should take place before six months of submergence and such prior rehabilitation will create a sense of confidence amongst the oustees and they will be in a better position to start their life by acclimatizing themselves with the new environment. The absence of any pre-
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 425 - J M Panchal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next