Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 51 (0.44 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs The International Airport Authority Of ... on 4 May, 1979
[30] The role of the Government as provider of services and
benefits to the people was noticed in Ramana Dayaram Shetty v.
International Airport Authority of India, 1979 3 SCC 489 in the
following words:
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
THE CONSTITUTION (FORTY-SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress vs Staet Of M.P. & Ors on 6 April, 2011
[27] In Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress vs. State of M.P.,
2011 5 SCC 29 , this Court was seised as well with the nature of
::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2017 23:26:19 :::HCHP
55
the norms to be adhered to for allotment of land, grant of quotas,
permits, licenses etc. by way of distribution thereof as State
.
Ramrameshwari Devi & Ors vs Nirmala Devi & Ors on 4 July, 2011
193. This Court in a very recent case Ramrameshwari Devi
v. Nirmala Devi had an occasion to deal with similar questions of
law regarding imposition of realistic costs and restitution. One of
::: Downloaded on - 28/12/2017 23:26:20 :::HCHP
74
us (Bhandari, J.) was the author of the judgment. It was observed
in that case as under: (SCC pp. 268-69, paras 54-55)
.
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir & Another on 9 May, 1980
1979 AIR(SC) 1628] and Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of
Jammu and Kashmir, 1980 AIR(SC) 1992], In Col.
Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December, 2009
In Satyender Singh v. Gulab Singh, 2012 129
DRJ 128, the Division Bench of Delhi High Court following
Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. observed that the Courts are
flooded with litigation with false and incoherent pleas and
tainted evidence led by the parties due to which the judicial
system in the country is choked and such litigants are
consuming Courts? time for a wrong cause."