Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Mr.Yogananda N vs State Of Karnataka on 17 January, 2022
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. The
impugned communication dated 15.03.2023 at Annexure
'A' is hereby quashed and set aside. The third
respondent-Assistant Director is hereby directed to
consider the application filed by the petitioners seeking
sanction of plan in terms of Annexure 'G' and proceed in
accordance with law without insisting for relinquishment of
a portion of the property belonging to the petitioners free
of cost, in terms of the judgment mentioned hereinabove
in the case of Dr.Arun Kumar B.C. (supra). If the
respondent-BBMP requires any portion of the property
belonging to the petitioners for the purposes of road
widening, the same can be acquired in a manner known to
law or by grant of Transferable Development Rights in
-7-
NC: 2023:KHC:25664
WP No. 7935 of 2023
terms of Section 14-B of the Karnataka Town and Country
Planning Act, 1961.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1