Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)A.N. Kaul vs Neerja Kaul & Anr on 3 July, 2018
17. The judgements relied upon by the plaintiff also hold to this effect and
it would be relevant to refer to para 11 of A.N. Kaul vs. Neerja Kaul and
Another (Supra), which reads as under:-
P.S. Jain Co. Ltd. vs Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. on 16 December, 1996
6.14. He stated that the present Suit is therefore a fit case for
pronouncement of judgment under Order XV Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 ('CPC') since no "triable issues" have been raised by the
contesting defendants. To this effect, the plaintiff has also placed reliance on
the judgments of this Court in A.N. Kaul v. Neerja Kaul and Another2,
P.S. Jain Co. Ltd. v. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. and Others3 and
Sanjay Gupta v. Sunil Kumar Gupta4.
Sanjay Gupta vs Sunil Kumar Gupta on 23 October, 2018
6.14. He stated that the present Suit is therefore a fit case for
pronouncement of judgment under Order XV Rule 1 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 ('CPC') since no "triable issues" have been raised by the
contesting defendants. To this effect, the plaintiff has also placed reliance on
the judgments of this Court in A.N. Kaul v. Neerja Kaul and Another2,
P.S. Jain Co. Ltd. v. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. and Others3 and
Sanjay Gupta v. Sunil Kumar Gupta4.
Meenakshi Manna vs Smt Suriti Manna & Anr. on 12 May, 2022
16. At this juncture, it would be apposite to refer to the Order XV of CPC,
which empowers the Court to pronounce judgment at once, upon finding
that the parties are not on an issue of any question of law or fact. A Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in Meenakshi Manna v. Smt. Suriti Manna
and Another6, while allowing a revision petition filed against an order
passed by the Trial Court, whereby the application under Order XV CPC
was rejected, held as under: -
1