Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (1.42 seconds)The Representation Of The People Act, 1950
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ryots Of Garabandho vs Zemindar Of Parlakimedi on 10 May, 1943
In India, during the British days' the
three chartered High Courts of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras
were alone competent to issue
(1) Vide Ryots of Garbandho v, Zemindar of Parlkime 70 I,A.
129 at page 140
256
writs and that too within specified limits and the power was
not exercisable by the other High Courts at all. "
Veerappa Pillai vs Raman & Raman Ltd. And Others on 17 March, 1952
(4) Vide Veerappa Pillai v, Ramon & Raman Ltd., [1952]
S.C.R. at 594.
Flection Commission, India vs Saka Venkata Subba Raounion Of ... on 27 February, 1953
In that
situation " as this Court observed in Election Commission,
India v. Saka Venkata Subba Rao (1), " the makers of the
Constitution having decided to provide for certain basic
safeguards for the people in the new set up, which they
called fundamental rights, evidently thought it necessary to
provide also a quick and inexpensive remedy for the
enforcement of such rights and, finding that the prerogative
writs, which the Courts in England had developed and used
whenever urgent necessity demanded immediate and decisive
interposition, were peculiarly suited for the purpose, they
conferred, in the States' sphere, new and wide powers on the
High Courts of issuing directions, orders, or writs
primarily for the enforcement of fundamental rights, the
power to issue such directions " for any other purpose "
V.V.R.N.M. Subbayya Chettiar vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras on 21 December, 1950
III ; R. v. Income Tax
Special Purposes Commissioners, 21 Q,B.D. 313.
(3) [19521 1 K.B. 338 at 357.
1