Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)

State Of Karnataka And Anr vs H. Ganesh Kamath Etc. Etc on 31 March, 1983

MANU/SC/0450/1979 : (1979)IILL J209SC on the other, which has been brought out in one of the judgments under appeal of Karnataka High Court in State of Karnataka v. H. Ganesh Rao decided on http://www.judis.nic.in 10 1.6.2000, reported in2001 (4) KLJ 466, learned Additional Solicitor General urged that the scheme for regularization is repugnant to Articles 16(4), 309, 320 and 335 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, these cases are required to be heard by a Bench of Five learned Judges (Constitution Bench).
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 371 - D P Madon - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc. Etc vs Piara Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc on 12 August, 1992

46. Learned Senior Counsel for some of the respondents argued that on the basis of the doctrine of legitimate expectation, the employees, especially of the Commercial Taxes Department, should be directed to be regularized since the decisions in http://www.judis.nic.in 22 Dharwad (supra), Piara Singh (supra), Jacob, and Gujarat Agricultural University and the like, have given rise to an expectation in them that their services would also be regularized.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 1473 - B P Reddy - Full Document
1   2 Next