Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)

Council Of Homeopathic System Of ... vs Suchintan And Ors on 21 April, 1993

Yet another aspect which renders the veracity of these judgments as regards they being good in law is that in none of these cases the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suchintan's case (supra) been considered, this for the reason that the said judgment was not brought to the notice of the Court. Had it been otherwise, the decisions would have been different.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 41 - S Mohan - Full Document

Prabhoor Singh Hayer And Others vs Baba Farid University Of Health ... on 7 November, 2008

Full Bench of this Court in the case of Prabhoor Singh Hayer and others vs. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences and others, 2009 (1) RSJ 243, while dealing with the Regulations relating to M.B.B.S. Course, held that the general scheme of the Regulations which are intended C.W.P.No.15852 of 2008 -26- to maintain academic standards and promote completion of Course by ensuing through satisfactory and proper attention to details as stipulated in the said Regulations cannot be watered down. While dealing with regulation 7.7, it was held that the said Regulation does not regulate eligibility to appear in the Second Professional Examination. Even when a candidate has passed the supplementary examination and joins the main batch of students, he may still remain ineligible to appear in the examination if he does not satisfy other conditions for appearance in the examination as mandated by the Regulations. Where the scheme of the Regulations requires studies to be undertaken by the students in a systematic and methodical manner, giving proper attention to each subject taught in each semester including all aspects of training programme other than lecture studies cannot be overlooked. It was further held that the eligibility to be promoted to a higher professional semester, would not make the candidate eligible to appear in the examination if the conditions mandated for such qualification are not satisfied by the candidates.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - H Gupta - Full Document

Paramjeet Kaur And Others vs The State Of Punjab And Others on 25 September, 2008

The above position leads us to a situation where none of the judgments rendered by the above-mentioned Division Benches of this Court was on consideration of the merits on the case or of the Ordinances applicable to the examinations for which the petitioners were craving indulgence to appear in. In all the Division Bench decisions referred to above, the orders were passed on the basis of the concession given by the counsel appearing for the respondents.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1