Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.49 seconds)
R.D. Gupta & Ors. Etc vs Lt. Governor. Delhi Admn, & Ors. Etc on 7 August, 1987 cites

Reserve Bank Of India vs N. C. Paliwal & Others on 24 August, 1976

In the light of our conclusion, the two appeals CA NO. 2971 and 2970 of 1983 filed by the NDMC have to fail in so far as the main issues are concerned. Mr. Misra, learned counsel for the NDMC contended before us that it was open to the NDMC to constitute different cadres among its employees as laid down in Paliwal's case and furthermore the grant of SS Committee pay scales and ex-gratia payments to all the employees would seriously affect the finances of the NDMC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 41 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document

Reserve Bank Of India & Ors vs C.N. Sahasranaman & Ors on 30 April, 1986

The decisions in Reserve Bank of India v. C. Paliwal (supra) & Reserve Bank of India v. C.N. Sahasranaman (supra) relied on by Mr. Misra are of no assistance in this case because what we are concerned is whether diferent pay scales and allowances can be given to a section of the staff when they belong to a unified cadre and are governed by common re- cruitment policy, common seniority list and common transfer policy. It was urged by the learned counsel that the High Court was not justified in directing payment at the SS Committee pay scales for the employees of the electricity wing from June 1975 to May 1982 as that would result in the NDMC paying Rs.51,98,079 and in addition the payment of the arrears calculated on the difference in pay with reference to the SS Committee pay scales for the period between 1.4.1972 to 30.9.1973 would cost another Rs.7,30,062 thus in all casting a financial burden of more than Rs.50 lakhs on the NDMC. In the view we propose taking of the matter in the light of our conclusions, this grievance does not call for discussion.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 55 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Dhirendra Chamoli And Anr. vs State Of U.P. on 5 August, 1985

In Dhirendra Chamoli's case, the principle was reiterated and it was held that when "the persons engaged by the Nehru Yuvak kendras performed the same duties as those performed by class IV employees appointed on regular basis against sanctioned posts, it is difficult to understand how the Central Govern- ment can deny to those employees the same salaries and conditions of service as class IV employees regularly ap- pointed against sanctioned posts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 201 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1   2 Next