Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.30 seconds)
M/S Radiall India Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India on 24 September, 2018 cites

Muthusavarri Pillai Paper Products And ... vs Cce on 3 March, 2004

Government also finds support from the observations of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s ITC Ltd. Vs. CCE reported as 2004 (171) ELT-433 (SC), and M/s Paper Products Vs CCE reported as 1999 (112) ELT - 765 (SC) that the simple and plain meaning of the wordings of statute are to be strictly adhered to. As such there is no force in the plea of the applicant that the lapse should be considered as a procedural one which is condonable in nature. As such, as the applicant did not follow the requirements of the Notification No.19/2004/CE(NT), the rebate claims are rightly held inadmissible.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Itc Ltd vs Cce, Kolkata Iv on 24 July, 2018

Government also finds support from the observations of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s ITC Ltd. Vs. CCE reported as 2004 (171) ELT-433 (SC), and M/s Paper Products Vs CCE reported as 1999 (112) ELT - 765 (SC) that the simple and plain meaning of the wordings of statute are to be strictly adhered to. As such there is no force in the plea of the applicant that the lapse should be considered as a procedural one which is condonable in nature. As such, as the applicant did not follow the requirements of the Notification No.19/2004/CE(NT), the rebate claims are rightly held inadmissible.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1