Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)The Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Jindal Poly Film Ltd vs Designated Authority Directorate ... on 12 February, 2020
In support of this
17
AD/51206/2022
submission, learned counsel placed reliance upon the decision of the
Delhi High Court in Jindal Poly Film Ltd. vs. Designated
Authority6. Learned counsel also submitted that the final findings are
in the nature of recommendation and anti-dumping duty can be
imposed only by the Central Government by issuance of a
notification. The notification only would, therefore, gives a cause of
action for filing an appeal before the Tribunal. According to the
learned counsel, the actual challenge by the domestic industry or the
importers/exporters is to the determination contained in the final
findings issued by the designated authority since the reasoning as to
the existence, degree and effect of dumping is only found in the final
findings of the designated authority and in an appeal before the
Tribunal, the challenge is always made to the final findings of the
designated authority. Learned counsel pointed out that the
consequential notification is also challenged, which in the process gets
set aside or modified, only to make the appellate remedy effective for
the appellant. It is for this reason that the learned counsel submitted
that it is only the final findings issued by the designated authority,
acting on behalf the Central Government under section 9A (6) read
with the 1995 Anti-Dumping Rules, that constitute an "order of
determination in respect of existence, degree and effect of any alleged
dumping".
Section 128 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 129 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 9B in The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Customs Tariff Act, 1975 [Entire Act]
1