Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. on 28 January, 2003

Thus, we note in the present case, journal entries were made by the assessee prior to the decision of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Triumph International Finance Pvt Ltd (supra), and such an action of the assessee making the journal entry adjusting the loan in question can be noted to be in line with the judicial precedent as laid down in CIT vs Noida Toll Bridge Co Ltd (supra). Therefore, assessee bonafidely believed that such an action does not attract section 269T of the Act. In such a scenario, we are of the opinion that 7 ITAs 3605/Mum/2019 & 259/Mum/2017 there was reasonable cause as per section 273B of the Act for non levy of penalty under section 271E of the Act.
Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 62 - Full Document

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs Uppal Chadha Hi Tech Developers (P) Ltd. ... on 12 November, 2018

In this context we note that such an alternate contention was considered by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs Ajitnath Hi-Tech Builders (P) Ltd (2019) 414 ITR 316 (Bom) at clause (b) and (i) of para 3 of the order and accepted by the Hon'ble High Court. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) deleting the penalty, so we confirm it and dismiss the appeal of Revenue.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1