Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.21 seconds)

State Of Karnataka & Ors vs Ameerbi & Ors on 7 December, 2006

"5. Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties at length. At the outset, it is required to be noted that the appellant herein was working as Anganwadi Worker under the Integrated Child Development Scheme and was being paid honorarium and even her services were not full time service. That the appellant raised Industrial Dispute challenging her discontinuation as Anganwadi Workers holding inter alia that her termination as Anganwadi Worker is in breach of Section 25 F, G and H of the Industrial Disputes Act. That considering and relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ameerbi and Ors (supra) and the direct decision of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Patdi Taluka Panchayat (supra), the Labour Court has rejected the Reference on the ground that the appellant cannot be said to be workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 250 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 Next