Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (0.48 seconds)

Dr. Shamlal Narula vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Punjab on 9 April, 1964

54. The judgement of hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Shamlal Najrula (supra) is quite distinguishable on facts. In that case, the interest under the Land Acquisition Act was awarded from the date of possession till the date of payment of compensation. Their Lordships observed that under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, the ownership of land is vested in the Government the moment the possession is taken by the Govt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 95 - Full Document

Asst Cit(Ltu) 1, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd, Mumbai on 24 February, 2020

We have also applied our mind to the Judicial precedents cited before us. It is observed, in case of Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd. (Supra) which amalgamated with the assessee company, the Tribunal has consistently taken the view that these expenses have to be allowed as Revenue expenditure. In the latest order passed in ITA No.1885/Mum/2018 dated 25.07.2024, the Tribunal has followed its earlier decision in assessee's case and upheld the order of learned First Appellate Authority allowing deduction. Facts being identical, respectfully following the consistent view of the 11 ITA No.5982 & 6758/Mum/2011 A.Y. 2008-09 Grasim Industries Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 38 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next