Smt Mooli Devi &Ors vs State Of Raj And Ors on 15 January, 2010
9. The petitioners in the said writ petition have stated in para 3 of
the writ petition that they are aggrieved of the action of respondents,
whereby, every now and then, the placement agencies are changed,
whereas, instead of such contractual appointments there should have
been a regular process of selection of teachers since the programme
of education under the SSA is a continuing education programme and
cannot be said to be a fixed term Project. The petitioners further
stated in said para that initially from 1.4.2007 to 31/3/2009 the
placement agency M/s Maa Vaishanav Devi Security Services was so
appointed, whereas, from 1.4.2010 till September 2010 M/s Rajasthan
Rojgar Paramarsh Centre, Sirohi was appointed as placement agency,
which even made payment to the petitioners of the fixed honorarium
from July 2009 till September, 2009. The grievance of the petitioners
is that every time new placement agency is appointed by the State
Government upon tenders being issued and such placement agency
issued fresh advertisement inviting applications from the aspirants
seeking appointment as teachers and petitioners have to again
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6568/2010
Mooli Devi Choudhary & Ors. vs. State & Ors.