Meghji Kanji Patel vs Kundanman Chamanlal Mehtani on 14 November, 1967
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The sole contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is the same which was urged before the appellate court viz., that the notice was not duly served and, therefore, decree passed by the court below suffered from legal infirmity. Learned counsel in support of his contention placed reliance on Meghji Kanji Patel v. Kundanmal Chamanlal Mehtani (AIR 1968 Bom 387), wherein it was held:--