Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.31 seconds)Brahmdeo Choudhary vs Rishikesh Prasad Jaiswal & Anr on 22 January, 1997
In Brahmadeo Choudhary v. Rishikesh Prasad Jaiswal and Anr., 1997 (2) AWC 1003 (SC), the Supreme Court held that even a stranger could file an application under Order XXI, Rule 97, C.P.C. and the same has to be adjudicated by the executing court under Order XXI, Rule 97 (2) read with Rule 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Baleshwar Tewari/& Ors vs Sheo Jatan & Ors on 20 March, 1997
In Baleshwar Tewari v. Sheo Jatan Tewari and Ors., (1997) 5 SCC 112, the Supreme Court held that the entries in the revenue record is not sufficient to indicate that the person is in possession of the property in question.
Vishal Singh & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 24 October, 1997
The same view was again reiterated by the Supreme Court in Vishal Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1998 SC 308. Thus, the release application could not be rejected solely on the basis of the assessment list. The Rent Control and Eviction Officer must find that the petitioner was in possession of the properties before rejecting the application on the ground that the release application was mala fide.
Talib Husain And Anr. vs Ist Additional District Judge, ... on 3 October, 1985
In Talib Hasan and Anr. v. Ist Additional District Judge, Nainital and Ors., 1986 (1) ARC 1, a Full Bench of this Court held that a prospective allottee has no right to be heard on the release application of the landlord. Consequently, I hold that the evidence brought on record by a prospective allottee could not be considered by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer.
1