Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)
West Bengal State Electricity Board And ... vs Shanti Conductors Pvt. Ltd. on 22 February, 2007
cites
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Central Bank Of India vs Vrajlal Kapurchand Gandhi And Anr on 16 July, 2003
Maru Ram Etc. Etc vs Union Of Lndia & Anr on 11 November, 1980
20. The appellant in Shubedar Ram v. Union of India, questioned the jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhubaneswar in entertaining a suit filed by the respondents challenging the action of taking over of the vehicle obtained by him on lease. The appellants contended that in the face of specific clause in the related agreement, the Court at Calcutta only had the jurisdiction to try any dispute arising out of the contract. The Apex Court ruled that it is open for the parties to fix the jurisdiction of a competent Court to have their dispute adjudicated by that Court alone. Elucidating the proposition, it held that if one or more Courts have jurisdiction to try any suit, it is open for the parties to choose one of such competent Courts to decide their disputes.
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Bahrein Petroleum Co. Ltd vs P. J. Pappu And Another on 16 August, 1965
In Bahrein Petroleum Company Ltd. (supra), it was held in principle, that if the defendant allows the trial Court to proceed to pronounce its judgment without raising the objection as to the place of suing and takes the chance of a verdict in his favour, he clearly waives the objection and will not be subsequently permitted to raise it. Long and continued participation by the defendant in the proceedings without any protest may, in appropriate case, amount to a waiver of the objection, it declared.
Section 8 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. & Ors vs Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune ... on 30 January, 2006
(4) , Mayar (H.K.) Ltd. and Ors. v. Owners & Parties, Vessel M.V. Fortune Express and Ors.
1