Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.33 seconds)The State Of Punjab vs Gurmit Singh & Ors on 16 January, 1996
In the judgment reported in (1996)2 SCC 384 in
the case of State of Punjab Vs. Gurmit Singh and others, in
paragraph 9 regarding evidence of victim of sexual assault,
it is held as under:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Sheikh Zakir vs State Of Bihar on 2 June, 1983
In the judgment reported in 1983 Crl.L.J. 1285
SC in the case of Sheikh Zakir Vs. State of Bihar, we would
like to refer to paragraph 9 of the said judgment, wherein
it is held as under:
State Of Karnataka By The Kadur Police vs Revannaiah on 25 February, 2005
In the judgment reported in ILR 2005 KAR 2232
in the case of State of Karnataka by the Kadur Police Vs.
Revannaiah, we would like to refer the paragraphs 18, 19
and 20, which reads as follows:
State Of U.P. vs M.K. Anthony on 6 November, 1984
19. As to how evidence of a witness has
to be appreciated, the Supreme Court observes
as follows in STATE OF U.P. v. M.K. ANTHONY.
Sardul Singh vs State Of Haryana on 27 September, 2002
State Of Rajasthan vs N. K. Accused on 30 March, 2000
30. Having considered the principles and the law laid
down in the judgments referred to supra, this Court has to
appreciate the evidence available on record.