Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)
Lalith Kumar And Ors. vs Collector Of Customs on 12 August, 1988 cites

Manick Chand Paul & Others Etc vs Union Of India And Others on 17 April, 1984

In this context we may also refer to the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Manik Chand Paul and 35 Ors v. Union of India and 3 Ors (Writ Petition Nos. 918 to 953 of 1977 decided on 17-4-1984) wherein the Supreme Court, while upholding the constitutional validity of Section 27(7) (b) of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968, has held that Section 27(7) (b) confines "a licensed dealer to carry on business as such dealer to the premises specified in his licence". This observation of the Supreme Court came to be made in the context of the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 27(7) (b) of the Act particularly when the writ petitioners before the Supreme Court challenged the Government of India's letter of instructions to the Collectors of Central Excise throughout the country directing them to withdraw the facility till then afforded to licensed dealers to send ornaments for sale through travelling salesmen and the Trade Notices issued by the Collectors of Central Excise pursuant thereto withdrawing the said facflity with immediate effect.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 41 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1