Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.20 seconds)Consumer Protection Act, 2019
The Air (Prevention And Control Of Pollution) Act, 1981
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Purtabpore Co. Ltd vs Cane Commissioner Of Bihar & Ors on 21 November, 1968
8. The closure directions communication dated 8 th October 2025
thus suffers from the vice of bias and has been issued against the
rules of natural justice. Though in a different fact-situation, the
Hon'ble Supreme Court observed in 'Purtabpore Co. Ltd. v. Cane
Commissioner of Bihar & Others' (1969) 1 SCC 308 that the executive
officers entrusted with a statutory discretion are not absolved from
their duty to exercise their personal judgment in individual cases.
The non-compliances recorded in the said order referred to (i) Tin
barricading not upto the height of 30' (ii) not providing automatic two-
level tyre washing facility (iii) not providing concrete pit for effluent
generated from transit mixer and vehicle washing and discharge into
drainage (iv) CAAQMS not connected to the MPCB server. These
6
::: Uploaded on - 15/11/2025 ::: Downloaded on - 21/11/2025 21:51:16 :::
PDP 6-WP-15034-2025.doc
deficiencies except the deficiency at serial number (iv) were not
recorded in the proposed closure directions notice dated 2 nd July
2025. Quite clearly, the communication dated 8 th October 2025
containing the closure directions has been issued by the Regional
Officer, MPCB at the instance of the letter dated 9 th September 2025.