Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.53 seconds)
Dr. Ashok Kumar Srivastava @ Ashok Kumar ... vs The State Of Bihar on 9 August, 2023 cites

Madhu Limaye vs The State Of Maharashtra on 31 October, 1977

"21. The concept of an intermediate order was further elucidated in Madhu Limaye v. State of Maharashtra (1977) 4 SCC 551 : 1978 SCC (Cri) 10] by contradistinguishing a final order and an interlocutory order. This decision lays down the principle that an intermediate order is one which is interlocutory in nature but when reversed, it has the effect of terminating the proceedings and thereby resulting in a final order. Two such intermediate orders immediately come to mind--an order taking cognizance of an offence and summoning an accused and an order for framing charges. Prima facie these orders are interlocutory in nature, but when an order taking cognizance and summoning an accused is reversed, it has the effect of terminating the proceedings against that person resulting in a final order in his or her favour. Similarly, an order for framing of charges if reversed has the effect of discharging the accused person and resulting in a final order in his or her favour.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 1313 - N L Untwalia - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next