Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (0.29 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 13 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan And ... vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors on 5 November, 1981
28. Thus, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the
judgments (referred supra), law means the legislation passed by the
parliament or State Legislation or Statutory rules or orders.
Article 162 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
K. Nagaraj & Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. Etc on 18 January, 1985
In
K.Nagraj v. State of A.P9, Apex Court opined that right of person to
his livelihood is property which is subject to rules of retirement.
State Of Kerala vs V. Padmanabhan Nair on 14 July, 1999
In
State of Kerala v. Padmanabhan10, the Apex Court opined that
right of pension is property under the Government service Rules.
Shrimant Madhav Rao Scindia H.S.S. vs The State Of M.P.And Ors. on 2 July, 2015
In
Madhav Rao Scindia Vs. State of M.P11 and State of M.P. Vs.
Ranojirao12, the Apex Court opined that property in the context
of Article 300-A includes 'money', salary accrued pension and cash
grants annually payable by the Government; pension due under
Government Service Rules; a right to bonus and other sums due to
employees under statute.
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Ranojirao Shinde & Anr on 21 March, 1968
In
Madhav Rao Scindia Vs. State of M.P11 and State of M.P. Vs.
Ranojirao12, the Apex Court opined that property in the context
of Article 300-A includes 'money', salary accrued pension and cash
grants annually payable by the Government; pension due under
Government Service Rules; a right to bonus and other sums due to
employees under statute.
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978
In Re: Sant Ram13 a case which arose before "Maneka
Gandhi Vs. Union of India14", the Supreme Court ruled that the
right to livelihood would not fall within the expression "life" in
Article 21. The Court observed as follows:-