Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.60 seconds)

Sanchit Bansal & Anr vs Joint Admission Board & Ors on 11 October, 2011

8. The learned Single Judge has considered the scope of judicial review in educational and academic matters, which is within the exclusive domain of the professional experts and the role of the courts is very limited by relying upon the case of Sanchit Bansal and another vs. Joint Admission Board and others, reported in (2012) 1 SCC 157, more particularly paragraphs 25 and 27 of the said judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 131 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Vijay Karan Singh vs U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... on 9 April, 2004

So far as the question of violation of principles of natural justice is concerned, the learned Single Judge has relied on the case of Ran Vijay Singh and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 357 and referred to the celebrated case Ridge vs. Baldwin (1964) A.C. 40. Referring to the said case, the Apex Court has held that though the principles of natural justice should itself be sufficient to grant relief, however, if on an admitted or undisputed factual position only one conclusion is possible and permissible, the court need not issue a writ merely because there is violation of principles of natural justice. Thus, the question of violation of principles of natural justice also does not arise. Hence, the argument canvassed by the learned advocate for the appellant qua breach of principles of natural justice is not sustainable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 217 - S Ambwani - Full Document
1