cites: 24778892

Union Of India vs Balbir Singh Turn on 8 December, 2017

35. Reliance placed on the judgment of Hara Bhupal (supra) is misconceived and cannot be accepted as the same solely relied upon the view taken in Balbir Singh Turn (supra), which has not been endorsed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the subsequent judgments in RK Sharma (supra), Virender Singh (supra) and Narender Kumar (supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 176 - D Gupta - Full Document

Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 10 - Cited by 33697

Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 19 - Cited by 19525

Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 2 - Cited by 13610

Article 148 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 5 - Cited by 760

Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 0 - Cited by 122106

Union Of India vs Ex. Hc/Gd Virender Singh on 22 August, 2022

35. Reliance placed on the judgment of Hara Bhupal (supra) is misconceived and cannot be accepted as the same solely relied upon the view taken in Balbir Singh Turn (supra), which has not been endorsed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the subsequent judgments in RK Sharma (supra), Virender Singh (supra) and Narender Kumar (supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 102 - B M Trivedi - Full Document

M. Hara Bhupal vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 February, 1997

35. Reliance placed on the judgment of Hara Bhupal (supra) is misconceived and cannot be accepted as the same solely relied upon the view taken in Balbir Singh Turn (supra), which has not been endorsed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the subsequent judgments in RK Sharma (supra), Virender Singh (supra) and Narender Kumar (supra).

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Balbir Singh Negi vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 March, 1996

The respondents therein approached the Armed Forces Tribunal which held [Balbir Singh v. Union of India, 2014 SCC OnLine AFT 1128] that the benefit of ACP granted to an employee is part of the pay structure which affects the pay and also his pension. The Armed Forces Tribunal held that an ACP is not an allowance but a part of pay and therefore, in terms of the government resolution, the employees were entitled for MACP with effect from 1-1-2006.

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 73 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi ... vs The Registrar, Central Administrative ... on 23 April, 2002

In its Order dated 28.4.2021 in Civil Appeal No. 1579/2021 [arising out of SLP (C) No. 15572/20 19] of Union of India v/s R.K. Sham1a & Others, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under:-

Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 398 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results

Union Of India vs Balbir Singh Turn on 8 December, 2017

Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Article 148 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Union Of India vs Ex. Hc/Gd Virender Singh on 22 August, 2022

M. Hara Bhupal vs Union Of India And Ors on 24 February, 1997

Balbir Singh Negi vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 March, 1996

The Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi ... vs The Registrar, Central Administrative ... on 23 April, 2002