Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.35 seconds)
Ram Lal Agarwal S/O. Late Moti Lal, Aged ... vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Rep.By ... on 25 March, 2014 cites

Whirlpool Corporation vs Registrar Of Trade Marks, Mumbai & Ors on 26 October, 1998

"However, while entertaining an objection as to the maintainability of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the court should bear in mind the fact that the power to issue prerogative writs under Article 226 of the Constitution is plenary in nature and is not limited by any other provisions of the constitution. The High Court having regard to the facts of the case, has a discretion to entertain or not to entertain a writ petition. The Court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions in the exercise of this power (See Whirlpool Corpn. V. Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 8 SCC 1 ). And this plenary right of the High Court to issue a prerogative writ will not normally be exercised by the Court to the exclusion of other available remedies unless such action of the State or its instrumentality is arbitrary and unreasonable so as to violate the constitutional mandate of Article 14 or for other valid and legitimate reasons, for which the Court thinks it necessary to exercise and the said jurisdiction."
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 1316 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1