Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.42 seconds)

Kulwinder Singh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Another on 3 February, 2014

In a recent case titled as Kulwinder Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Punjab 2015(2) R.C.R (Criminal) 918, two independent witnesses were associated in the investigation. But, they were not examined by the prosecution as they were won over by the accused and rather they appeared as defence witnesses. The Hon'ble Apex Court held that no adverse inference can be drawn for the non-examination of said witnesses SANJAY KHAN 2015.12.22 15:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh CRA-S-1672-SB of 2003, CRA-S-2003-SB of 2003 & CRA-S-754-SB of 2004 16 and the case of the prosecution cannot be rejected solely on the ground that independent witnesses have not been examined when, on perusal of the evidence on record, the Court finds that the case put forth by the prosecution is trustworthy. It was further laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court that when the evidence of the official witnesses are trustworthy and credible, there is no reason not to rest the conviction on the basis of their testimonies.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 80 - I Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 Next