Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
S.Kaladevi vs V.R.Somasundaram & Ors on 12 April, 2010
In S. Kaladevi v. V.R.
Somasundaram and Ors., (2010) 5 SCC 401 this Court
has restated the legal position that when an unregistered
sale deed is tendered in evidence, not as evidence of a
completed sale, but as proof of an oral agreement of sale,
the deed can be received as evidence making an
endorsement that it is received only as evidence of an oral
agreement of sale under the proviso to Section 49 of the
1908 Act.
The Registration Act, 1908
Ameer Minhaj vs Dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar on 4 July, 2018
9. He also relied upon the judgment in the case of Ameer
Minhaj Vs. Dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar reported in (2018) 7
SCC 639, wherein it is held as follows:
S.Bhaskar vs A.R.Palanisamy (Deceased) on 19 December, 2009
7. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the
judgment in the case of S.Baskar Vs. V.Palanisamy and Ors
reported in 2014 (1) MWN (Civil) 61, wherein it is held as follows:
M/S K.B.Saha And Sons Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Development Consultant Ltd on 12 May, 2008
12.In the reported decision, this Court has adverted
to the principles delineated in K.B. Saha and Sons Private
Limited v. Development Consultant Limited, (2008) 8 SCC
564 and has added one more principle thereto that a
document is required to be registered, but if unregistered,
can still be admitted as evidence of a contract in a suit for
specific performance.
Section 35 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Anr vs Buddha Jagadheeswararao & Ors on 8 October, 2015
10. It is also relevant to rely upon the judgment in the case of
Yellapu Uma Maheswari & Another Vs. Buddha
Jagadheeswararao and others reported in 2016 (2) LW 656,
9/14
http://www.judis.nic.in
CRP.PD.No.2751 of 2018
wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held as follows: