Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)
1 Vimla Sharma vs . State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 8 August, 2013 cites

Sh. Jai Parkash Sharma vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. Through on 14 January, 2011

RW1 is Satyapal Sharma has deposed on oath that he is the respondent No. 2 in the present succession petition and is the eldest son of deceased Late Sh Jai Kishan Sharma and petitioner Vimla Sharma. He further stated that he has no objection for grant of succession certificate in favour of petitioner regarding debts and securities of deceased Sh. Jai Kishan Sharma mentioned in Para No. 6 in the present succession petition. He has proved self attested photocopy of ration­card for his residence proof as Mark A. RW2 is Jaipal Sharma has deposed on oath that he is the respondent No. 3 in the present succession petition and is the younger son of deceased Late Sh Jai Kishan Sharma and petitioner Vimla Sharma. He further stated that he has no objection for grant of succession certificate in favour of petitioner regarding debts and securities of deceased Sh. Jai 6 Vimla Sharma vs. State of NCT of Delhi & ors SC no. 59/12 Kishan Sharma mentioned in Para No. 6 in the present succession petition. He has proved self attested photocopy of ration­card for his residence proof as Mark A. RW3 is Sunita Sharma has deposed on oath that she is the respondent No. 4 in the present succession petition and is the daughter of deceased Late Sh Jai Kishan Sharma and petitioner Vimla Sharma. She further stated that she has no objection for grant of succession certificate in favour of petitioner regarding debts and securities of deceased Sh. Jai Kishan Sharma mentioned in Para No. 6 in the present succession petition. She has proved self attested photocopy of Voter I­card for her residence proof as ExPW3/A. Thereafter Petitioner Evidence was closed.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1