Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.36 seconds)
Indira Gandhi National Open University vs Presidency Educational Trust on 27 May, 2015 cites

Ashok Chand Singhvi vs University Of Jodhpur & Ors on 18 January, 1989

16. The first aspect to be considered by us is of delay in re-filing the appeal. The senior counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner has argued that considering the nature of the controversy, no case for condonation the delay is made out. Reliance in this regard is placed on Postmaster General Vs. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563, P.K. Ramachandran Vs. State of Kerala (1997) 7 SCC 556 Ashok Chand Singhvi Vs. University of Jodhpur AIR 1989 SC 823, Miss Sangeeta Srivastava Vs. Prof. U.N. Singh AIR 1980 Delhi 27 and Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. International Security & Intelligence Agency Ltd. (2004) 3 SCC 250.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 105 - M M Dutt - Full Document

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors vs Intnl. Security & Intelligence Agency ... on 6 February, 2003

16. The first aspect to be considered by us is of delay in re-filing the appeal. The senior counsel for the respondent / writ petitioner has argued that considering the nature of the controversy, no case for condonation the delay is made out. Reliance in this regard is placed on Postmaster General Vs. Living Media India Ltd. (2012) 3 SCC 563, P.K. Ramachandran Vs. State of Kerala (1997) 7 SCC 556 Ashok Chand Singhvi Vs. University of Jodhpur AIR 1989 SC 823, Miss Sangeeta Srivastava Vs. Prof. U.N. Singh AIR 1980 Delhi 27 and Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. International Security & Intelligence Agency Ltd. (2004) 3 SCC 250.
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 61 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Indian Statistical Institute vs M/S Associated Builders And Ors on 2 December, 1977

17. Having considered the rival submissions, we are of the view that a case for condoning the delay in re-filing the appeal is made out. Supreme Court in Indian Statistical Institute Vs. Associated Builders (1978) 1 SCC 483 held that if initial institution is within time, Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has no application. The Courts are liberal in condoning the delay in re-filing.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 36 - P S Kailasam - Full Document
1