Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 8 January, 2015

Though, the Petitioner, by letter dated 12.11.2014 (Annexure-11), was issued a "recordable warning to be careful 3 2025:JHHC:28622 in future," was admittedly issued without following the departmental procedure or concluding any enquiry. As a matter of fact, this warning was issued with a view to improve efficiency and maintain discipline. It is an administrative warning and in support of his contention he has relied upon the judgment passed in the case of Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.1, wherein at para 48 and 50, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 206 - D Misra - Full Document
1