Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 449 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 55 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Bombay Abkari Act, 1878
Section 446 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mohammed Kunju And Another vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 1999
4. I refer to the dictum of the Apex Court in Mohammed
Kunju v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2000 SC 6 in which it has
been held that if there is forfeiture of the bond executed by the
surety due to default of the accused in making appearance before
the court, it is open to the court concerned to resort to the steps
contemplated in Section 446 of the Code against the sureties,
besides the accused himself.
Ram Lal vs State Of U.P on 5 March, 1979
I also refer to the dictum in Ram Lal
v. State of U.P., AIR 1979 SC 1498, the relevant portion of
which reads thus-
1