Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.26 seconds)
The Temple Of Hahnemann Homeopathic ... vs The Union Of India & Ors on 12 December, 2017 cites

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Limited on 9 August, 2016

"21.3. Thirdly, because if the statute provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner, then it must be done in that manner alone. All other modes or methods of doing that thing must be deemed to have been prohibited. That proposition of law first was stated in Taylor V. Taylor 3 and adopted later by the Judicial Committee in Nazir Ahmad V. King Emperor 4 and by this Court in a series of judgments including those in Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh V. State of Vindhya Pradesh 5, State of U.P. V. Singhara Singh 6, Chandra Kishore Jha V. Mahavir Prasad 7, Dhanajaya Reddy V. State of Karnataka 8 and Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. V. Essar Power Ltd. 9. The principle stated in the above decisions applies to the cases at hand nor because there is any specific procedure that it is prescribed by the statute for grant of approval but because if the approval could be granted by anyone in the police hierarchy the provision specifying the authority for grant of such Patna High Court CWJC No.16589 of 2017 dt.12-12-2017 38/41 approval might as well not have been enacted."
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 195 - A K Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 Next