Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Raghu Singh And Anr. vs Abdul Wahab on 11 February, 1896
300, and Raghu Singh v. Abdul Wahab (1896) I.L.R. 23 Cal. 442 appear to have been overruled by the Legislature.
Section 4 in The Cattle-Trespass Act, 1871 [Entire Act]
The Cattle-Trespass Act, 1871
Shama vs Lechhu Shekh on 9 September, 1895
1. Sections 20 to 23 of Act I of 1871 (The Cattle Trespass Act) conferred, no doubt, a. special jurisdiction on certain Magistrates, but Section 4, Clause (o) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Act V of 1898) includes within the definition of the word offence "any act in respect of which a complaint may be made under Section 20 of the Cattle Trespass Act, 1871." Section 260 Clause (m) of the Code makes offences under Section 20 of the Cattle Trespass Act, 1871, triable summarily. Thus under the Code of 1898, cases under Section 20 of the Cattle Trespass Act come within the ordinary jurisdiction of the Magistracy and there is no reason now for holding that these oases should be dealt with in any way different from any other offence. Shama v. Lechhu Shekh (1895) I.L.R. 23 Cal.
1