Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.20 seconds)Section 3 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Section 60 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 58 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Paramasiva Udayan vs Krishna Padayachi And Anr. on 21 November, 1917
In Paramasiva Udayan v. Krishna Padayachi, ILR 41 Mad 535 : (AIR 1918 Mad 491), it was held that a scribe who described himself only as a scribe, could be an attesting witness if he saw the signing of the document by the executant and that the court could allow evidence to be let in for the purpose of showing that he was an attesting witness. Therefore, the decisive test for ascertaining whether a witness signing a document as attestor, is not one of name or designation by which the person styles himself or to the phraseology used to describe him, but the character he fills and this can be ascertined by what he does with due regard to the intention accompanying his act.
Abinash Chandra Bidyanidhi ... vs Dasarath Malo And Ors. on 25 July, 1928
In Abmash Chandra v. Dasarath Malo, ILR 56 Cal 598 : (AIR 1929 Cal 123), Rankin, C. J. Observes that in order to constitute proper attestation no formal attestation clause is necessary; nor is it necessary that the signature of the attesting witness should appear in any particular place.
Tata Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. vs Charles Joseph Smith on 22 February, 1929
In support of that contention reference was to the decisions in Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. V. Charles Joseph Smith, ILR 8 Pat.