Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.23 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Jagat Singh And Ors. vs Teja Singh And Ors. on 20 January, 1970
21. This view was approved by the Full Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Jagat Singh v. Teja Singh, (FB).
Bai Champa And Ors. vs Chandrakanta Hiralal Dahyabhai ... on 20 February, 1973
In Bai Champa v. Chan-drakanta Hiralal Dahyabhai Sodagar , and in Chinnakolandai v. Thanji Gounder, AIR 1985 Mad 497, the same view was taken; and these cases were relied upon by Mr. Dudhat.
V. Tulasamma & Ors vs V. Sesha Reddi (Dead) By L. Rs on 17 March, 1977
In V. Tulsamma v. V. Sesha Reddi, AIR 1977 SC 1944 at p. 1947, with great respect, it has been rightly said :--
Ganesh Mahanta And Ors. vs Sukria Bewa And Ors. on 26 April, 1963
23. As against the decisions of the various High Courts cited by Mr. Dudhat, the only decision which Mr. Apte could rely upon was the decision of a Single Judge of the Orissa High Court in Ganesb Mahanta v. Sukriya Bewa, , where a view appears to have been taken that where a done to whom the widow had gifted property gifts back the property to the widow after the coming into force of the Hindu Succession Act, she acquires only a limited interest in the property. With great respect, the interpretation put by the learned Judge appears to me to be in conflict with the
plain terms of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act and the decisions of the various High Courts referred to above.
1