Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.22 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Karnataka vs K. Krishnan on 17 August, 2000
In State of Karnataka v. K. Krishnan, AIR 2000 SC 2729,
the apex Court held that liberal approach in the matter with respect
to the property seized which is liable to confiscation is uncalled for as
the same is likely to frustrate the provisions of the Act.
The State Of Orissa vs Sudhansu Sekhar Misra And Ors on 7 November, 1967
In the State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra, AIR
1968 SC 647, the Constitution Bench of the apex Court held that a
decision is only an authority for what it actually decides.
Gopal Chandra Das vs The State Of Orissa And Ors. on 23 April, 2008
petitioner has challenged, inter alia, the judgment dated 14.03.2017
passed by the learned District Judge, Keonjhar in FAO No.07 of
2016. By the said judgment, learned District Judge dismissed the
appeal; thereby confirmed the order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the
learned Authorized Officer-cum-Asst.
Malatilata Samal And Ors. vs State Of Orissa And Ors. on 10 July, 2002
14. The ratio laid down in Sk. Ibrahim and Malatilata Samal
(supra) proprio vigore apply to the facts of the case.
Sk.Ibrahim vs State Of Orissa & Others ........... ... on 22 January, 2010
12. An identical matter came up for consideration before a
Division Bench of this Court in the case of Sk. Ibrahim v. State of
Orissa and others, 2010 (I) ILR - CUT 271.
Suvendra Kumar Pattnaik vs State Of Orissa And Ors. on 5 August, 1993
18. No law has been laid down in Manoj Kumar Pattnaik and
Biswakesha Mohapatra (supra). The orders are not binding
precedent.
1