Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.43 seconds)The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 13 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Amending Act, 1897
Roop Chand vs State Of Punjab on 10 October, 1962
51. Be it noted in the said case, reference was made to
Behari Kunj Sahkari Awas Samiti v. State of U.P., which
followed the decision in Roop Chand v. State of Punjab. It is
seemly to note here that the said principle has been followed
in Indore Vikas Pradhikaran.
Sanjay Pukhraj Bafna And Anr vs Volkswagen Finance Pvt. Ltd on 12 October, 2020
In "Sanjay Pukraj Bafna v. Volkswagon Finance (P) Ltd. Reported
in 2020 SCC OnLine Bombay 6362, it was held that an improper and
impermissible appointment imperils any arbitral award, for it goes to the root of
the matter.
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
22.Further, any violation of provisions of the Act is against the public
policy of India. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has also held at paragraph No.27 in
the case of “Associate Builders vs. Delhi Development Authorities” reported
in 2015 3 SCC 49, which reads as follows:
Section 33 in The Orissa Survey and Settlement Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Perkins Eastman Architects Dpc vs Hscc (India) Limited on 26 November, 2019
9.When a person is ineligible to be appointed as an Arbitrator, in the
same way, he is also ineligible to nominate any Arbitrator also. This is what the
Hon'ble Apex Court has held in the Perkins' case (cited supra).