Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.32 seconds)Section 313 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Section 285 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Shailesh Harilal Shan And Others, Etc. vs Matushree Textiles Limited And Others ... on 20 April, 1993
46.In the case of Shailesh Harilal Shah Vs. Matushree Textiles Ltd.,
AIR 1994 Bombay 20 relied upon by Mr. Rao, the prejudice caused
by a shorter notice came to be considered. In that case instead of
the notice of 21 days the notice was sent 20 days prior to the
meeting. Since no prejudice was shown to have been caused to the
Plaintiff no relief was granted. It was held that the requirement of
the service was directory and not mandatory.