Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.30 seconds)The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Section 22 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Income Tax Act, 1961
The Wealth-Tax Act, 1957
The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2006
Sir Sobha Singh & Sons (P) Ltd. vs New Delhi Municipal Council on 1 July, 1996
"5.1Incidentally, we may refer to yet another Division Bench decision
of this Court in Sir Sobha Singh & Sons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Ndmc, 1996 4 Ad
Del 56. The D.B. has observed (vide para 24) :- "If any property forms
subject matter of contractual rent then the rate of rent agreed upon
between the parties and which was being actually paid by the tenant
and received by the landlord can safely be accepted as determining
factor of rateable value unless there be material available to hold the
rate of rent having been influenced or depressed by reason of
extraneous consideration such as fraud, collusion, relationship,
expectation of some other benefit etc." The court has noticed some of
the instances which might have contributed to depression of rent. To
wit -- (1) The landlord has collected huge amount as "Pagri" and is
charging nominal rent. (3) The landlord collects huge amounts as
interest-free security and lets out the premises at nominal rent with
permission to sub-let. The tenant, after taking over possession, lets out
the premises at exorbitant rent. (4) The premises are let out to a sister
concern at low rent with permission to sub-let, and the sister concern
lets out the premises for huge amounts. In the operative part of the
order one of the directions made by the Court while directing
Assessing Authority to make the assessment afresh is :- Apart from
ITA No. 803/2007, ITA No.499/2008 & ITA No.1113/2008 Page 15 of 17
such other information which the assessing authority may be inclined
to collect and such enquiry as the Assessing Authority may deem fit to
hold, in particular the assessing authority shall enquire :- xxxxxxxxx (ii)
whether there is any reason to hold the actual rate of rent applicable
between the landlord and the tenant either inflated or depressed by
reason of extraneous considerations which would justify the assessing
authority discarding such rate of rent for the purpose of finding out the
rate of rent at which the premises may be reasonably expected to let.
Raman K. Sawhney vs Chairperson, Ndmc And Anr. on 7 October, 2002
More elaborate discussion is found in the judgment rendered by the
learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Raman K. Sawhney
vs. Chairperson, NDMC & Anr. [100 (2002) DLT 546] including the
one cited above in the following terms:
Punj Sons Pvt. Ltd. vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 13 December, 1996
Law on this point was discussed by another Bench of this Court in the
case of M/s. Punj Sons Pvt. Ltd. vs. Municipal Corporation of
Delhi [65 (1997) DLT 473].