Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (1.41 seconds)
Suresh Govindrao Kurhade vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 30 July, 2024 cites

Syed Abdul Qadir & Ors vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 December, 2008

In the light of the above, the law laid down in Syed Abdul Qadir (supra) and Rafiq Masih (supra), would be applicable to the case of the Petitioners. On the issue of the undertaking, this Court has already concluded that, an undertaking extracted at the stroke of retirement, is taking advantage of the helplessness of such Petitioners. They are at the verge of the retirement and at the time of calculating their retiral benefits, an undertaking is extracted. There are instances when the Petitioners have approached this Court as the employers have not released the retiral benefits, since the Petitioners did not accede to the demand of an amount.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 2121 - B N Agrawal - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

In the light of the above, the law laid down in Syed Abdul Qadir (supra) and Rafiq Masih (supra), would be applicable to the case of the Petitioners. On the issue of the undertaking, this Court has already concluded that, an undertaking extracted at the stroke of retirement, is taking advantage of the helplessness of such Petitioners. They are at the verge of the retirement and at the time of calculating their retiral benefits, an undertaking is extracted. There are instances when the Petitioners have approached this Court as the employers have not released the retiral benefits, since the Petitioners did not accede to the demand of an amount.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Nilima Ashok Kale Alias Mohini Vijay ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 9 December, 2021

This Court has also considered the tendency of employers in extracting written undertakings from the employees at the stroke of their retirement, vide the judgment delivered dated 14.03.2024 in Writ Petition No.2810 of 2024 7970.24wp etc (4) (Vijaya Khandu Tayade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and others) and Writ Petition No.2863 of 2024 (Asha Dhanraj Nimbalkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and others). It would be apposite to reproduce paragraph Nos. 4 to 7 hereunder:-
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S G Dige - Full Document
1