Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)
Mohd. Moin vs Union Of India Through The Secretary on 31 October, 2011 cites

R.L. Marwaha vs Union Of India & Ors on 12 August, 1987

12. As regards, temporary service rendered in MCD to be counted as qualifying service for pensionary purposes, reliance is placed by the learned counsel for the applicant on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of R.L. Marwala v. Union of India and others, 4 JT 1987 (3) S.C. 292 to contend that as per Para 7 of the Govt. order dated 29.8.1984 irrespective that one is temporary servant if joined Central Govt. would be allowed to count his past service rendered by him in autonomous body towards pensionary benefits irrespective of his status.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 129 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

Sh. V.K. Bhatnagar vs Union Of India Through on 12 November, 2010

The matter was taken up with Basic Education Officer, Raebareli to confirm correctness of service rendered by the individual. The letter No. 4107 08/2003-2004 dtd. 11.08.2003 confirming the correctness of above service and resignation tendered on 10.09.1978 is attached in original for perusal. Perusal of the letter of the respondents shows that it has been admitted by the applicant that he joined the services of the respondents after obtaining the prior permission from the earlier employment hence the case of the applicant is covered under Rule 26 (2) CCS (Pension) Rules. Reliance has also been placed on a order passed by the C.A.T. Principal Bench reported in Administrative Total Judgments 2005(1) page 602 in the case of H.K. Bhatnagar Vs. Union of India and ors. The relevant portion of the order is reproduced as under :
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1