Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.33 seconds)

Jalandhar Improvement Trust vs Sampuran Singh on 1 April, 1999

8. Learned advocate for the respondent has relied on the decision in the case of Jalandhar Improvement Trust v. Sampuran Singh (1999) 3 SCC 494 and Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Indore v. President, Indore Development Authority (2006) 2 SCC 604 in support of his submission that entitlement to plots cannot be claimed by ineligible persons because some one other, though not eligible alloted plots and there is no such right with an employee to claim residential plot on the basis of concessions. That allotment contrary to statutory rule cannot be protected by the principle of promissory or equitable estoppal.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 210 - N S Hegde - Full Document

Kastha Niwarak Grahnirman Sahakari ... vs President, Indore Development ... on 7 February, 2006

Over and above this, those employee/officers serving with the corporation and whose application for allotment of residential plots, have remained pending and have been deprived of such allotment, on account of departmental inquiry/suspension, in that case all such employees - officers should be allotted the residential plots for which they are eligible at the place they are entitled to, on concessional rate as per the priority listing, as per the corporation circular dated 28/9/2004 and this policy should be implemented on and from the date of this circular. Furthermore, no allotment of plot of area bigger than that which an employee is eligible of should be allotted and that all the allotment officers shall strictly implement the present instructions and the relevant Estate planner while making new provision for residential plot shall plan such area as per the prevalent policy of the corporation. The officers are directed to issue the acknowledgement of having received this present circular by writing about such receipts to General Manager (Allotment) and in the event of any clarification or difficult in implementation, they shall contact General Manager (Allotment).
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 83 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1