Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.31 seconds)
Promila Jaiswal vs Defence on 15 April, 2026 cites

Promila Nunia vs The Union Of India And 4 Ors on 16 September, 2022

2. It may be noted that earlier the petitioner UOI had filed only one appeal bearing C.A. No. 23521/2017 (UOI vs Major Pritam Singh) against the impugned common order dated 17.02.2016 passed by the High Court disposing of 347 appeals before it. This Court vide the order dated 23.02.2023 dismissed the said appeal only on the ground that when the judgment of High Court qua large number of claimants had attained finality, there was no justification to consider the question raised at the Page 6 of 12 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00247 of 2025 Promila Jaiswal Vs. UOI & Ors.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A Barua - Full Document

Union Of India vs Major Pritam Singh on 2 August, 2023

2. It may be noted that earlier the petitioner UOI had filed only one appeal bearing C.A. No. 23521/2017 (UOI vs Major Pritam Singh) against the impugned common order dated 17.02.2016 passed by the High Court disposing of 347 appeals before it. This Court vide the order dated 23.02.2023 dismissed the said appeal only on the ground that when the judgment of High Court qua large number of claimants had attained finality, there was no justification to consider the question raised at the Page 6 of 12 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00247 of 2025 Promila Jaiswal Vs. UOI & Ors.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - B M Trivedi - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs J. Ahmed on 7 March, 1979

7.3.2 The other case is J Ahmed (supra) involving removal of an officer of the Indian Administrative Service from service even as he was retiring from service on account of disturbances in Nowgong District where he was posted as District Magistrate, for failing to take preventive measures, showing lack of leadership, not personally visiting the scene of disturbances, not keeping government informed and showing ineptitude. Hon'ble Supreme Court took note of the officer's age and agreed with Hon'ble High Court that the officer was not in service on the date an order removing him from service was made and, therefore, the order was illegal and void. Hon'ble Supreme Court delved into the aspect of misconduct in the following manner:
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 473 - D A Desai - Full Document

Management Utkal Machinery Ltd vs Workmen, Miss Shanti Patnaik on 27 October, 1965

In industrial jurisprudence amongst others, habitual or gross negligence constitute misconduct but in Management, Utkal Machinery Ltd. v. Workmen, Miss Shanti Patnaik, in the absence of standing orders governing the employees' undertaking, unsatisfactory work was treated as misconduct in the context of discharge being assailed as punitive.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 102 - V Ramaswami - Full Document
1   2 Next