Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)Section 4 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
The State Of Orissa vs Madan Gopal Rungta.The State Of ... on 25 October, 1951
25. At this stage, learned counsel for the
petitioners has requested that this Court may
Page 22 of 23
HC-NIC Page 22 of 23 Created On Sat Oct 17 00:55:13 IST 2015
C/SCA/11498/2015 JUDGMENT
continue the interim relief, which is granted earlier
for a further period of two weeks, which we are
unable to accede to as the Supreme Court in case of
The State of Orissa V. Madan Gopal Rungta, reported
in A.I.R. (39) 1952 Supreme Court 12 as well as this
Court in case of State of Gujarat V. Nirmalaben
Waghela, reported in 2003 (1) G.L.H. 434, has
observed in these two judgments that when the Court
is not entertaining the petition on merits and
relegating parties to the alternative remedy, the
interim relief may not be continued only to enable
the parties. As, when the Court is not adjudicating,
it would be proper to vacate the interim relief.
Hence, interim relief granted earlier, cannot be
continued and it is vacated.
The Companies Act, 1956
State Of Gujarat vs Nirmalaben Waghela, President on 21 September, 2002
25. At this stage, learned counsel for the
petitioners has requested that this Court may
Page 22 of 23
HC-NIC Page 22 of 23 Created On Sat Oct 17 00:55:13 IST 2015
C/SCA/11498/2015 JUDGMENT
continue the interim relief, which is granted earlier
for a further period of two weeks, which we are
unable to accede to as the Supreme Court in case of
The State of Orissa V. Madan Gopal Rungta, reported
in A.I.R. (39) 1952 Supreme Court 12 as well as this
Court in case of State of Gujarat V. Nirmalaben
Waghela, reported in 2003 (1) G.L.H. 434, has
observed in these two judgments that when the Court
is not entertaining the petition on merits and
relegating parties to the alternative remedy, the
interim relief may not be continued only to enable
the parties. As, when the Court is not adjudicating,
it would be proper to vacate the interim relief.
Hence, interim relief granted earlier, cannot be
continued and it is vacated.
1