Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.37 seconds)Section 3 in The Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 [Entire Act]
The Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986
Section 3 in The Karnataka Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002
Jharkhand Lokayukta Act, 2001
The Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984
The Gujarat University Act, 1949
Andhra Pradesh Lokayukta Act, 1983
Justice K.P. Mohapatra vs Sri Ram Chandra Nayak And Others on 9 October, 2002
In the light of the clear distinction in Section 3(2)(a) and (b) of the
Karnataka Act and the Orissa Act, it was held that the judgment of this
Court in K.P. Mohapatra (supra) was inapplicable while construing the
provisions of the Karnataka Act, since, the language employed are not
pari materia. It will be appropriate to state that the provisions of the
Gujarat Act and the Orissa Act are identical in so far as it related to
the consultation process is concerned and, therefore, it was
categorically held that the role of the Chief Justice was primary by
virtue of the specific provision contained in the Act. In the light of
specific provision contained in Section 3(2)(a) and (b) of the Karnataka
Act in the later judgment, it was held as under in paragraph 62: