Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.25 seconds)Nil Ratan Kundu & Anr vs Abhijit Kundu on 8 August, 2008
15.5. To decide the issue of the best interest of the
child, the Court would take into consideration various
8
::: Uploaded on - 27/02/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 28/02/2023 04:13:27 :::
26-wp-14801-2022-F.doc
factors, such as the age of the child; nationality of the child;
whether the child is of an intelligible age and capable of
making an intelligent preference; the environment and living
conditions available for the holistic growth and development
of the child; financial resources of either of the parents
which would also be a relevant criterion, although not the
sole determinative factor; and future prospects of the child.
15.6. This Court in Nil Ratan Kundu v. Abhijit Kundu
[Nil Ratan Kundu v. Abhijit Kundu, (2008) 9 SCC 413] set
out the principles governing the custody of minor children in
para 52 as follows : (SCC p. 428)
"Principles governing custody of minor children
Gaurav Nagpal vs Sumedha Nagpal on 19 November, 2008
15.4. This Court in Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal
[Gaurav Nagpal v Sumedha Nagpal, (2009) 1 SCC 42 :
Vikram Vir Vohra vs Shalini Bhalla on 25 March, 2010
(See also Vikram
Vir Vohra v. Shalini Bhalla [(2010) 4 SCC 409 : (2010) 2
3
::: Uploaded on - 27/02/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 28/02/2023 04:13:27 :::
26-wp-14801-2022-F.doc
SCC (Civ) 171].)"
Mrs. Elizabeth Dinshaw vs Arvand M. Dinshaw And Anr on 11 November, 1986
19. The statutory provisions dealing with the custody of
the child under any personal law cannot and must not
supersede the paramount consideration as to what is
conducive to the welfare of the minor. In fact, no statute on
the subject, can ignore, eschew or obliterate the vital factor
of the welfare of the minor. (Vide Elizabeth Dinshaw v.
Arvand M. Dinshaw [(1987) 1 SCC 42 : 1987 SCC (Cri) 13 :
Chandrakala Menon (Mrs) And Anr. vs Vipin Menon (Capt.) And Anr. on 14 January, 1993
AIR 1987 SC 3], Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon
[(1993) 2 SCC 6 : 1993 SCC (Cri) 485], Nil Ratan Kundu v.
Abhijit Kundu (2008) 9 SCC 413], Shilpa Aggarwal v. Aviral
Mittal [(2010) 1 SCC 591 : (2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 192] and
Athar Hussain v. Syed Siraj Ahmed [(2010) 2 SCC 654 :
(2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 528] .)
Shilpa Aggarwal vs Aviral Mittal & Anr on 9 December, 2009
AIR 1987 SC 3], Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon
[(1993) 2 SCC 6 : 1993 SCC (Cri) 485], Nil Ratan Kundu v.
Abhijit Kundu (2008) 9 SCC 413], Shilpa Aggarwal v. Aviral
Mittal [(2010) 1 SCC 591 : (2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 192] and
Athar Hussain v. Syed Siraj Ahmed [(2010) 2 SCC 654 :
(2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 528] .)
Athar Hussain vs Syed Siraj Ahmed & Ors on 5 January, 2010
AIR 1987 SC 3], Chandrakala Menon v. Vipin Menon
[(1993) 2 SCC 6 : 1993 SCC (Cri) 485], Nil Ratan Kundu v.
Abhijit Kundu (2008) 9 SCC 413], Shilpa Aggarwal v. Aviral
Mittal [(2010) 1 SCC 591 : (2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 192] and
Athar Hussain v. Syed Siraj Ahmed [(2010) 2 SCC 654 :
(2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 528] .)
Smriti Madan Kansagra vs Perry Kansagra on 28 October, 2020
14. Subsequently, in the case of Smriti Madan Kansagra v. Perry
Kansagra, (2021) 12 SCC 289 , the Apex Court, in paragraphs 15.1
to 15.6, laid down the parameters for custody of children.
Rosy Jacob vs Jacob A. Chakramakkal on 5 April, 1973
In Rosy Jacob v.
Jacob A. Chakramakkal [Rosy Jacob v. Jacob A.
Chakramakkal, (1973) 1 SCC 840] this Court held that :